UK PM rejects call for data centre moratorium amid community concerns
Written by Rebecca Uffindell Thu 10 Sep 2026

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has rejected a call for a moratorium on future data centre approvals, arguing that the infrastructure can act as a “magnet” for wider investment while acknowledging that host communities need to see the benefits.
The intervention came after Labour MP Ian Lavery raised concerns over three proposed data centres in Sleekburn and Cambois, in his Blyth and Ashington constituency. Lavery questioned whether scarce industrial land could instead support industries creating more local jobs.
“Communities are being asked to give up valuable land and suffer local disruption,” Lavery told the House of Commons.
He asked Burnham to support a moratorium until regulation catches up and introduce a Critical National Infrastructure levy so communities hosting data centres could share in their economic benefits.
Data Centres Called “Magnet for Investment”
Burnham acknowledged Lavery’s concerns but rejected a national pause on development.
“I understand the concern that he’s raising about data centres, but I have to say to him, at this point, I won’t go as far as a moratorium,” said Burnham.
The Prime Minister instead argued that data centres could help attract additional investment to an area.
“And I can speak to him from experience that the data centre itself can be the magnet that clusters in other investment over time, and that needs to be remembered,” he added.
Burnham also pointed to the Government’s AI Growth Zone policy, under which local authorities will be able to retain 100% of business rate growth generated within the zones so it can benefit communities.
The exchange puts a growing tension in UK data centre policy into focus: how to reconcile the Government’s push for AI and digital infrastructure with concerns over land, resources, disruption, and the direct economic benefits delivered to the communities hosting it.
Data Centres Sit Inside the UK’s AI Strategy
The Government’s reluctance to pause development comes as data centres take on greater strategic importance.
The UK designated data centres as Critical National Infrastructure in 2024, recognising their role in supporting economic activity and public services.
AI is making that infrastructure more politically significant.
The Government has recently moved AI closer to central decision-making, with Kanishka Narayan attending Cabinet as Minister for AI. Narayan said the Prime Minister had asked him to attend as a sign of the importance being placed on the technology.
“Nations have a narrow window to decide whether they shape AI or get shaped by it. Britain is in that window right now,” he said.
That policy direction increases the importance of the physical infrastructure required to support AI growth, but it also puts greater pressure on government and developers to demonstrate what large data centre projects return to the places where they are built.
Community Benefits Become Part of the Argument
Lavery’s intervention reflects a broader debate about those trade-offs. There is tension between Britain’s need for data centre capacity and how developments compete for land and resources. Underpinning this is whether benefits are sufficiently visible locally.
That issue is also emerging in public attitudes.
Recent Telehouse research covered by Techerati found that awareness of data centres is increasing while perceptions of their impact have become less positive. The research also identified environmental impact and community consultation as areas of concern.
Burnham’s response effectively accepts part of that argument. While rejecting a moratorium, he agreed that communities should see benefits from AI and data centre investment.
His emphasis on retained business rates and the potential for data centres to attract surrounding investment suggests community benefit is becoming part of the political case for continued development rather than an issue separate from it.
Green Party Pushes for Tighter Restrictions
Other political voices have gone further.
The Green Party has called for restrictions on data centre development, arguing that planning rules should be tightened so communities do not come “a poor second” to infrastructure expansion.
The party has also raised concerns around jobs, national security, and the potential pressure developments could place on water resources.
Those arguments differ from the Government’s position, which continues to treat data centres as strategically important infrastructure for AI and the wider digital economy.
But both sides centre the question of what large-scale development means for the communities and resources around individual sites.
New York Takes a Different Approach
Outside the UK, some governments have opted for temporary restrictions while developing new rules for AI infrastructure.
New York introduced the first statewide US pause on discretionary environmental permits for new hyperscale data centres in July.
Governor Kathy Hochul’s Executive Order allows the pause to remain in place for up to one year while the state develops a framework addressing energy demand, environmental impact, water use, grid resilience, and community benefit.
It is not a blanket ban on data centre construction, but it provides an example of the type of temporary intervention Lavery is asking the UK Government to consider.
Burnham’s response indicates that Britain is not currently heading in the same direction.
Instead, the Government is attempting to pair continued infrastructure development with mechanisms intended to return more of its economic benefits locally.
That leaves the underlying political argument unresolved.
As AI increases demand for data centre capacity, the question has morphed from whether Britain needs the infrastructure to about the terms on which it should be built.
For developers and operators, that raises the bar beyond securing land, power, and planning permission. Demonstrating how investment benefits the communities hosting that infrastructure is becoming a larger part of the case for building it at all.
Written by Rebecca Uffindell Thu 10 Sep 2026
Tags:
AI Growth Zones AI infrastructure Data centre planning UK GovernmentMost Viewed News
Fri 2 Oct 2026
AI skills gap grows despite 64% of workers using AI
